Advertisements
1 Comment

Charm over Gameplay, Longevity and Graphics?


Many hardcore gamers share the view that graphics should not be regarded higher than a game’s gameplay and that, in fact, a game’s gameplay is its most important aspect . Generally speaking, a gamer that feels otherwise is looked down upon by the rest of the gaming community. Graphics is indeed important – or at least, the presentability of a game’s graphics, seeing as I think even the PS1 era’s blocky-looking graphics are downright beautiful – but gameplay is certainly something of higher importance than a game’s graphical style or quality. After all, without gameplay, there’s no game. Obviously. Uh, usually.

Nothing is to be regarded higher than a game’s gameplay in most people’s book, but for me, this may not be the case. Oddly, I’ve come to realise that I may view charm either on par with or more important than a game’s gameplay. A colourful, bright or interesting looking game is something that instantly appeals to me; it’s likely half the reason that Rayman Origins was my favourite game of 2011.

The water levels of Rayman Origins is the perfect combination of beauty and charm to me.

Now, I’ve always been pretty vocal about how many modern games just don’t do it for me. I’m not just talking about the likes of Call of Duty – which despite getting a lot of stick for being pretty dull (which they are to me, don’t get me wrong) are very well-made games still – but also of other popular franchises that people unanimously agree are brilliant. Assassin’s Creed? Never played one. BioShock? Never played them. Batman Arkham games? Can’t get into them. They’re all legitimately great games and from a critical viewpoint I can recognise that, but I simply just can’t get into them, however much I try.

It even goes so far as to annoy people how ratty I can be about modern retail games. I’m unsure why I’ve got like this – perhaps because I find modern photo-realistic graphics to be rather dull, perhaps because getting into indie games in recent years has spoiled my perspective on gaming as a whole.

I own very few retail disc-based games on my PS3. I own the obvious ones like Grand Theft Auto IV and Red Dead Redemption, but other than that I don’t have that many and not due to a lack of money either, but to lack of interest. Watching E3 and other gaming events, it’s peculiar not being able to get excited about many of the titles that virtually the whole of the gaming community unanimously rave about.

The PSN store though? That’s a whole other story; I’ve spent a God-awful amount of money on the PlayStation Store as there are a great deal of interesting, beautiful, creative games there. I can totally be bought over on charm of a game alone and this is apparent more-so with the PSN Store (and freeware PC indie titles) than anything else. For example, though the gameplay itself is nothing unique or remarkably interesting, I rushed to buy Arkedo Studio‘s (creators of ‘Hell Yeah!‘) games PIXEL! and JUMP! when I saw them on the store. They’re gorgeous, bright, colourful looking games that are almost literally bursting with charm and are totally what HD TV’s were made for. Seriously, check out Arkedo’s PIXEL! game on the store if you own a PS3; at under £2 it’s a feast for your eyes and a wonderfully charming game, even if the gameplay is nothing hugely unique. I’d happily own these games over the likes of Skyrim any day.

‘Arkedo Series 03 – PIXEL!’ is a feast for the eyes and makes owning a HD TV feel worthwhile.

That’s not to say charm can’t go hand-in-hand with great, unique gameplay – in fact, it very often does. Just look at Double Fine‘s ‘Stacking‘, for example; a gorgeous-looking, charming and wonderfully original game and totally worth anyone’s time and money.

And charm to me isn’t always necessarily at all graphic related – a game can have charm in other aspects (such as a concept, soundtrack, message or story, so long as it’s not overly arty or pretentious), but the game generally needs to presentable in whatever graphical style it uses. And I’d much rather play a charming, interesting 10-minute long game than a dull-looking 10-hour long game. Indie title ‘Hero’s Adventure‘ (from VVVVVV‘s Terry Cavanagh) is a reasonable example of this; a very short but interesting game with very little gameplay. Even with its incredible length and virtually non-existent replayability, were it to be available for PSN, I’d likely be willing to pay a small fee for it.

Hero’s Adventure is a very short and mildly disturbing game.

Perhaps I’m just being pretentious, arrogant and picky, perhaps I’ll feel stupid about this in a week and perhaps playing thousands of indie games has changed my view on the gaming industry as a whole, but you’ll always find me getting more excited over games like The Puppeteer coming out than something like a new Uncharted game.

Advertisements

About Ryan Brown

Commonly going by the alias 'Toadsanime' online, Ryan Brown acts as Coin Arcade's editor and primary writer. With an avid interest in various aspects of gaming -- including general gaming, indie gaming, retro gaming and merchandise collecting -- he aspires to build a career in the video game journalism industry. He also writes his own descriptions as if talking about somebody else, apparently.

One comment on “Charm over Gameplay, Longevity and Graphics?

  1. Hi Ryan, you have a big point. I understand exactly what you mean, and you are absolutely right. I grew up back in the 80’s when the computers were 8-bit, slow and the graphics were crappy compared to modern computers. We had Commodore 64 which was a good machine, and the game makers made every effort to squeeze out the most of that technology. Out came a flood of games, some of them were really exciting with astounding music and sound effects, the gameplay was captivating – still with crappy graphics – but you played for hours, days, weeks, months without loosing that magnetic grip to that games. I still play those games from time to time on a emulator, and they still are captivating and magnetic, and the graphics still are crappy, but they have something that modern game lack.

    I really love strategy games like Civilization and Heroes of Might and Magic. I find Civilization II or III more interesting than Civilization IV, partly because of the graphics. It seems to me that in the history of game making – when game makers boost up the graphics, they lack something in the gameplay.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: