Video Game Journalism: A Look at Some of the Horse S**t

Video Game Journalism SucksAlike the video game industry these days, the video game journalism industry is a tad bit fucked up — and let’s face it, people like myself are part of the problem. I can try to differentiate myself from all of its horse shit, but at the end of the day I’m only adding to the growing mountain of feces that really needs cleaning up but is so large that nobody can really manage it.

I can point fun at last year’s big game journalism Doritosgate scandal all I like, but then here I am on Twitter cozying up to video game developers, indie game developers, PR individuals and even other game journalists. Although I’m not saying this as an excuse, that’s sort of all you can do as a small-time game journalist hoping to make this your career; it’s rather saddening to think that to make it in this industry, you absolutely have to suck-up to people, lest you won’t gain a job with a reputable game publication or have any contacts within the industry which you so desperately need.

But Doritosgate is over and anyone at all interested or involved in this line of work is already fully aware of the ethical issues encompassing it. Although they’re important issues, I don’t want to completely squeeze that ol’ thing — even if I do think that it caused a ruckus but made no significant changes anywhere.

So, instead of just repeating last year’s horse shit regarding game company’s and game journalist’s too-close-relationship and how aspiring journalists have to join in with this charade to make it, let’s address some of the other issues in the industry — and I do only mean ‘some of’, because boy is it riddled.

Horse20Poop20smThe Rumour Mill

First off, the industry is too self-involved. One game site posts a news story that other game sites re-report that other game sites re-report that other game sites re-report and so on. Although this Chinese-whsipers-esque strategy is almost unavoidable, it’s a prominent issue in that game journalists will see a news story pop up in their RSS feeds or Twitter or what have you and re-report it without checking on its original source first. Everyone does it — no name-dropping of course, but even the big-guns do this stuff when you’d think they’d have enough staff, experience and contacts to discover the reports themselves.

The primary issue here is this: the rumour factory that is the video game journalism industry needs to stop. It seems as simple as saying you work for a company and supplying some bullshit information or pictures for it to be considered newsworthy on a game site which will then get re-posted all around the community. It’s truly alarming how often, how easily and how rapidly utterly horse shit stories race around the industry. Sure, the vast majority point out that it’s a rumour or that it’s not yet confirmed, but then why is it news? I’m not talking about artwork and the like that probably have some backbone to it — though that’s not brilliantly relevant in some cases either — but more this ‘he said, she said’ approach regarding what certain individuals have apparently said (like this crap about Activision being annoyed at Nintendo fans regarding Black Ops II) and that sort of ridiculous trollop.

And remember the golden game journalistic rule: anything any gaming analyst says about anything is somehow newsworthy. Apparently.

Just to note: unless there’s sufficient evidence behind an unconfirmed story — and I do mean sufficient evidence — I’ll never write about something that’s currently unconfirmed, hearsay, an analyst’s view or simply a rumour. It’s not the kind of thing I’d want to read and it’s not the kind of thing I want to write.

cropped-header1.pngThe Bounce-back

Larger, more successful game sites contribute to the way the video game industry works itself in a big way and we seem to forget this. Their views (and more importantly, their Metracritic scores) are a great way for game companies to gather feedback about what it is gamers want — or at least that’s the plan, anyway.

If journalists are snuggling in bed with the aforementioned game company, they’re likely to consciously or sub-consciously be a little softer on their game. The game gets given a good score, even if it’s average, so the game companies believe that this reception means that this is what they should be doing more of. It’s a vicious cycle of horse shit.

The really interesting thing gamers need to keep in mind is that reviews are rarely written with journalists having entirely completed the game by themselves first. Again, an unavoidable situation and one I personally partake in as journalists do not have the time to complete every game they’re handed, but people should take almost everything they read with a pinch-of-salt. High-level game journalists are the expert of games they may sometimes appear to be, it’s just their job to look like they are.

We forget the important influence journalists have not only on gamer’s choice of purchase but also what’s being developed in the first place. It’s a screwed-up kind of middle-man really and it’s important for journalists to try having some respect for the industry they’re a part of (saying that, it’s not as if one individual can change the status-quo).

Manure happensMarket Saturation

This market is saturated. Everyone wants to try their hand at game journalism and there’s simply no room for it; every niche has been filled, every need is already suited for. The only way you have a chance at this isn’t to make consistently good editorials or reviews (the big game journalists have already played the games, thanks to being good ol’ buddies with the company’s PR or developers) but it’s to jump into the horse shit head-first.

Don’t worry about your legs hanging out — there’ll soon be more manure shoveled on to the pile to keep those lil’ toes of yours warm. Mmmm.


About Ryan Brown

Commonly going by the alias 'Toadsanime' online, Ryan Brown acts as Coin Arcade's editor and primary writer. With an avid interest in various aspects of gaming -- including general gaming, indie gaming, retro gaming and merchandise collecting -- he aspires to build a career in the video game journalism industry. He also writes his own descriptions as if talking about somebody else, apparently.

2 comments on “Video Game Journalism: A Look at Some of the Horse S**t

  1. This was harsh but true.

    Unfortunately an article like this falls on deaf ears for as far as the big gaming sites are concerned. They’re too busy circle-jerking egos and attending hotel parties to preview the latest CGI or pre-scripted hands-on demo to come back and yell to the masses how great the game will be, just until it releases and stirs a hornet’s nest of rage in the gaming community when it turns out to be crappy like Aliens: Colonial Marines.

    On the upside, some sites may have to reorganize how they address issues in the industry since the current trend is not sustainable, as indicated by IGN taking a major hit since the buyout from Ziff Davis.

  2. At some point, money and preview rights and all that noise need to be overlooked in order to balance out some of the nonsense we get. The fight for clicks and early access is leading to a whole generation of game journalism being looked at, as you so eloquently said yourself, as bullshit. But I don’t see any of that going anywhere any time soon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: